American Committee for US-Russia Accord

Russia loomed large over the US election in 2016, with allegations of politically motivated hacking and calls for further examination of President Trump’s business dealings in the region, Tom Switzer of Australia’s ABC Radio hosted Professor Stephen F. Cohen and journalist Eleanor Clift to discuss.

It is notable how often defenders of the bogus “credibility” argument have to rely on making things up to advance their case. The U.S. didn’t “retreat” from the Middle East under Obama (more’s the pity), and it is a stretch to say that it “abandoned” Ukraine.

There seems to be little doubt that the Ukrainians began the latest upsurge in fighting. Even RFE/RL, which is normally very pro-Ukrainian, admits as much.

As national Democratic leaders continue to blame Russian President Putin for their 2016 defeat, they’re leading their party into a realignment with the neocons and other war hawks, reports Robert Parry.

Nation Contributing Editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War.  Cohen begins by reiterating his historical generalization that 20th-century episodes of détente — under Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan — encountered ferocious opposition, even sabotage, on the part of enemies of more cooperative US-Russian relations…

In the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, the American media has been in state of panic over allegations of Russian hacking. The frenzy has been promoted by war hawks in both major parties, bolstering their bellicosity. But what do average Americans really think of the Russians?

The telephone conversation last Saturday between the American and Russian presidents seems to have been amicable and constructive, at least in a general sense. They are reported to have discussed key world issues as potential partners, not as adversaries or enemies.

The world today is overwhelmed with problems. Policymakers seem to be confused and at a loss.

But no problem is more urgent today than the militarization of politics and the new arms race. Stopping and reversing this ruinous race must be our top priority.

Some blame Trump’s victory on Russian interference. Others question who Trump really takes orders from, implying that it is Russian president Vladimir Putin, not Trump, who will be calling the shots in the White House. Still others decry Trump’s praise for Putin, going so far as to label it “treasonous.”

As one who advised President Reagan on how to end the Cold War, I welcome your plans to discuss US-Russian relations. Relations have reached a state that is dangerous for both our countries and, in fact, the entire world.

American foreign policy, especially its Russia policy, is a runaway train without rails, driven by a troubling confluence of hubristic ideological influences and bureaucratized sectoral interests networked through Washington.

Portraying Russia’s actions—in the United States and around the globe—in the most ominous terms, Durbin seems intent on foreclosing the possibility of a policy of détente with Russia under President Trump.

Nation Contributing Editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War. Cohen worries that unrelenting allegations that President Trump is a willing or unwilling agent of Putin’s Kremlin —  could limit or even cripple his ability to make wise decisions in regard to Russia, even in a dire crisis.